Fort Ouiatenon: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Bill Thayer (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Bot: Automated import of articles *** existing text overwritten *** |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{SocialNetworks}} | {{SocialNetworks}} | ||
{{PageHeader}} | {{PageHeader}}{{External|wikidata=Q3077977|wikipedia=Fort_Ouiatenon}} | ||
'''{{PAGENAME}}''' (1722-1763) - A fortified French trading post established in 1722 in present day Lafayette, Tippecanoe County, Indiana. Turned over to the British in 1761. Captured by hostile Indians during [[Pontiac's War]] in 1763 and abandoned. | '''{{PAGENAME}}''' (1722-1763) - A fortified French trading post established in 1722 in present day Lafayette, Tippecanoe County, Indiana. Turned over to the British in 1761. Captured by hostile Indians during [[Pontiac's War]] in 1763 and abandoned. | ||
<!-- | <!-- | ||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
|} | |} | ||
== | == History == | ||
--> | --> | ||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
{| | {| | ||
| | | | ||
<googlemap version="0.9" lat="40.406343" lon="-86.963562" zoom="17" width="500" scale="yes" overview="yes" controls="large" icons="http://www.fortwiki.com/mapicons/icon{label}.png"> | <googlemap version="0.9" lat="40.406343" lon="-86.963562" zoom="17" width="-500" height="-500" scale="yes" overview="yes" controls="large" icons="http://www.fortwiki.com/mapicons/icon{label}.png"> | ||
(F) 40.40634, -86.96356, Fort Ouiatenon | (F) 40.40634, -86.96356, Fort Ouiatenon | ||
(1722-1763) | (1722-1763) | ||
Latest revision as of 05:04, 26 February 2025
| More information at Warlike, Wikidata, Wikipedia
Fort Ouiatenon (1722-1763) - A fortified French trading post established in 1722 in present day Lafayette, Tippecanoe County, Indiana. Turned over to the British in 1761. Captured by hostile Indians during Pontiac's War in 1763 and abandoned. Current StatusMarkers and replica blockhouse not on actual site in Lafayette, Tippecanoe County, Indiana.
Sources:
Links:
Visited: No
|