Fort Sainte Anne (2): Difference between revisions
Ken Heaton (talk | contribs) m Added Category:Nova Scotia Not Visited |
Ken Heaton (talk | contribs) Added a source. |
||
Line 45: | Line 45: | ||
* [http://www.pc.gc.ca/apps/dfhd/page_nhs_eng.aspx?id=817 Parks Canada Sainte-Anne / Port Dauphin National Historic Site of Canada Englishtown, Nova Scotia] | * [http://www.pc.gc.ca/apps/dfhd/page_nhs_eng.aspx?id=817 Parks Canada Sainte-Anne / Port Dauphin National Historic Site of Canada Englishtown, Nova Scotia] | ||
* [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fort_Sainte_Anne_(Nova_Scotia) Wikipedia article Fort Sainte Anne (Nova Scotia)] | * [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fort_Sainte_Anne_(Nova_Scotia) Wikipedia article Fort Sainte Anne (Nova Scotia)] | ||
* [http://capebretonsmagazine.com/modules/publisher/item.php?itemid=2034 Cape Breton's Magazine, Issue 41, January 1986, Pages 23 to 28 - The Early History of St. Ann's (Englishtown)] | |||
* [http://www.blupete.com/Hist/Dates/1627-29.htm History of Nova Scotia Significant Historical Happenings By Year: 1627-29.] | * [http://www.blupete.com/Hist/Dates/1627-29.htm History of Nova Scotia Significant Historical Happenings By Year: 1627-29.] | ||
* [http://www.biographi.ca/en/bio/daniel_charles_1E.html Biography at the Dictionary of Canadian Biography Online DANIEL, CHARLES] | * [http://www.biographi.ca/en/bio/daniel_charles_1E.html Biography at the Dictionary of Canadian Biography Online DANIEL, CHARLES] |
Revision as of 09:56, 18 December 2017
Fort Sainte Anne (2) (1629 to 1641) - A French colonial fort located at present-day Englishtown, Victoria County, Nova Scotia, Canada.
History![]() The fort was occupied from 1629 to 1641. Fort Sainte Anne was later rebuilt as Simon Denys Fort. Some years later another military fort was built adjacent to the ruins of this fort, Fort Dauphin (1713-1758).
Current StatusA National Historic Site. No visible remains of any fort structures. An existing roadside carin with a plaque which reads: Plaque date: 1950
See Also: Sources:
Links: Visited: No
|