Madras Army Airfield: Difference between revisions
John Stanton (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
John Stanton (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 58: | Line 58: | ||
'''Links:''' | '''Links:''' | ||
* [https://www.americanairmuseum.com/place/199257 American Museum - Madras Army Airfield] | |||
* [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Madras_Municipal_Airport Wikipedia - Madras Municipal Airport] | * [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Madras_Municipal_Airport Wikipedia - Madras Municipal Airport] | ||
* [https://www.ibiblio.org/hyperwar/AAF/VI/AAF-VI-4.html The Army Air Forces in World War II, Part 6, men and Planes, Chapter 4.] | * [https://www.ibiblio.org/hyperwar/AAF/VI/AAF-VI-4.html The Army Air Forces in World War II, Part 6, men and Planes, Chapter 4.] |
Revision as of 21:14, 12 May 2022
HistoryIn January 1943 the Army confirmed that the small Oregon town of Madras would be the site of a combat training Army Airfield. The 1940 population of Madras was just 412. Construction of the new airfield included two 120' x 80' hangars for the Boeing B-17F Flying Fortress Bombers to be assigned at the base. Madras was overwhelmed by the construction activity that included hangers, runways, taxi strips, hard-stands, and the rapid influx of several hundred officers, enlisted GIs, and Army construction workers. Many newcomers had to find quarters in Madras homes and travel to the airfield by military buses. In September 1944 the mission changed from aircrew training to aircraft maintenance. Aircrew training moved to nearby Redmond Army Airfield and bomber flight instruction ended. In November 1945 the base was declared surplus and reverted to the control of the War Assets and the Civil Aviation Administration. A campaign by Madras and Jefferson County officials to obtain ownership and control of the base was successful and on 3 Apr 1947 Madras Army Airfield was transferred to civil authorities. Current StatusNow Madras Municipal Airport. The two WWII hangers still exist.
See Also: Sources:
Links:
Fortification ID:
Visited: No
|