Kootenai Post (3): Difference between revisions
John Stanton (talk | contribs) Created page with "{{SocialNetworks}} '''{{PAGENAME}}''' (1821-1824) - A Hudson's Bay Company (HBC) trading post first established in 1821 along the Kootenai River near present day Rainy Cre..." |
John Stanton (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 39: | Line 39: | ||
<googlemap version="0.9" lat="48.4124547" lon="-115.458499" zoom="16" width="500" scale="yes" overview="yes" controls="large" icons="http://www.fortwiki.com/mapicons/icon{label}.png"> | <googlemap version="0.9" lat="48.4124547" lon="-115.458499" zoom="16" width="500" scale="yes" overview="yes" controls="large" icons="http://www.fortwiki.com/mapicons/icon{label}.png"> | ||
(F) 48.4124547, -115.458499, Kootenai Post (3) | (F) 48.4124547, -115.458499, Kootenai Post (3) | ||
(1821-1824) | HBC (1821-1824) | ||
</googlemap> | </googlemap> | ||
|valign="top"| | |valign="top"| | ||
Revision as of 12:48, 4 August 2014
Kootenai Post (3) (1821-1824) - A Hudson's Bay Company (HBC) trading post first established in 1821 along the Kootenai River near present day Rainy Creek, Lincoln County, Montana. Abandoned in 1824.
History of Kootenai Post (3)
Established by the Hudson's Bay Company (HBC) along the Kootenai River in 1821 near present day Rainy Creek, Lincoln County, Montana.
Abandoned in 1824.
Current Status
Unknown.
Note: Some sources identify this as a North West Company (NWC) trading post but the NWC merged with the HBC in July 1821 and that ownership would have been short lived.
USGS Geographic Names Information System (GNIS) Database Entry: 1782425
|
{"selectable":false,"width":"500"} |
Location: Near Rainy Creek, Lincoln County, Montana. Map point is from the GNIS coordinates and may not be accurate. Maps & Images Lat: 48.4124547 Long: -115.458499 |
See Also:
Sources:
- Roberts, Robert B., Encyclopedia of Historic Forts: The Military, Pioneer, and Trading Posts of the United States, Macmillan, New York, 1988, 10th printing, ISBN 0-02-926880-X, page 472.
Links:
Visited: No