1870s System: Difference between revisions
John Stanton (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
John Stanton (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
|colspan="2"|[[File:Fort Baker Battery Cavallo 1938.jpg|795px|thumb|center|Battery Cavallo Built in 1870s, Armed in the 1890s, Shown here in a 1938 Aerial Photograph. Originally on Fort Lime Point later renamed as Fort Baker.]] | |colspan="2"|[[File:Fort Baker Battery Cavallo 1938.jpg|795px|thumb|center|Battery Cavallo Built in 1870s, Armed in the 1890s, Shown here in a 1938 Aerial Photograph. Originally on Fort Lime Point later renamed as Fort Baker.]] | ||
|} | |} | ||
The technological changes during the [[U.S. Civil War]] clearly obsoleted the [[Third System]] coastal defenses. The masonry Third System coastal fortifications could not stand up to large caliber rifled shipboard guns and ironclad vessels. These forts could be besieged and reduced to rubble in a short span of time with little cost to the attackers. | |||
Temporary fortifications surrounding major cities during the war had been constructed of earth and log works providing a relatively cheap and easily constructed defense. Earth and especially sand proved to have much more stopping power than masonry walls and any damage done could be repaired overnight. | |||
After the war these lessons were applied to coastal defenses so that instead of constructing large masonry forts, dispersed gun batteries with protective earthworks backed with stone or concrete instead of logs were built. The old forts were retained but only to provide strong points and suport for outlying batteries with occasional guns mounted on the barbette tier. In places where there was no [[Third System]] fort the batteries provided their own defense. | |||
---- | ---- |
Revision as of 14:39, 5 February 2015
1870s System (1870-1876) - Began with the end of the U.S. Civil War in 1865 and extended to the cutoff of Congressional funding for Seacoast fortifications in 1876. Followed by the Endicott Period. Little or no Congressional funding for seacoast defenses was provided in the years between the periods (1876-1890). The technological changes during the U.S. Civil War clearly obsoleted the Third System coastal defenses. The masonry Third System coastal fortifications could not stand up to large caliber rifled shipboard guns and ironclad vessels. These forts could be besieged and reduced to rubble in a short span of time with little cost to the attackers. Temporary fortifications surrounding major cities during the war had been constructed of earth and log works providing a relatively cheap and easily constructed defense. Earth and especially sand proved to have much more stopping power than masonry walls and any damage done could be repaired overnight. After the war these lessons were applied to coastal defenses so that instead of constructing large masonry forts, dispersed gun batteries with protective earthworks backed with stone or concrete instead of logs were built. The old forts were retained but only to provide strong points and suport for outlying batteries with occasional guns mounted on the barbette tier. In places where there was no Third System fort the batteries provided their own defense.
See Also: Sources:
Links: |
East Coast | Florida & Gulf Coast & West Coast |
---|---|
|
|