Category:Endicott Period Forts: Difference between revisions

From FortWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
John Stanton (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
John Stanton (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 10: Line 10:
(F) 48.133659, -122.765973, [[Fort Worden]]<br>(1897-1953)
(F) 48.133659, -122.765973, [[Fort Worden]]<br>(1897-1953)
(F) 40.80525, -73.791561, [[Fort Schuyler]]<br>(1833-1934)
(F) 40.80525, -73.791561, [[Fort Schuyler]]<br>(1833-1934)
(F) 40.794676, -73.778687, [[Fort Totten (3)]]<br>(1862-1995)


</googlemap>
</googlemap>

Revision as of 14:27, 3 February 2008

{"selectable":false,"height":"400","width":"800"}

Endicott Period Forts (1890-1910)

In 1885 US President Grover Cleveland appointed a joint army, navy and civilian board, headed by Secretary of War William C. Endicott, known as the Board of Fortifications. The findings of the board illustrated a grim picture of existing defenses in its 1886 report and recommended a massive $127 million construction program of breech-loading cannons, mortars, floating batteries, and submarine mines for some 29 locations on the US coastline.

Prior efforts at harbor defense construction had ceased in the 1870s. Since that time the design and construction of heavy ordnance advanced rapidly, including the development of superior breech-loading and longer-ranged cannon, making the US harbor defenses obsolete. In 1883, the navy had begun a new construction program with an emphasis on offensive rather than defensive warships. These factors combined to create a need for improved coastal defense systems.

The Endicott Board's recommendations would lead to a large scale modernization program of harbor and coastal defenses in the United States, especially the construction of modern reinforced concrete fortifications and the installation of large caliber breech-loading artillery and mortar batteries. Typically, Endicott period projects were not fortresses, but a system of well-dispersed emplacements with few but large guns in each location. The structures were usually open-topped concrete walls protected by sloped earthworks. Many of these featured disappearing guns, which sat protected behind the walls, but could be raised to fire. Mine fields were a critical component of the defense, and smaller guns were also employed to protect the mine fields from mine sweeping vessels.

Source:

Pages in category "Endicott Period Forts"

The following 95 pages are in this category, out of 95 total.